.png)
Feedback-Informed Treatment: Therapist Attitudes and the Equity Equation
- Cindy Hansen
- Oct 10
- 8 min read
Updated: 6 days ago
In recent years, the integration of Feedback-Informed Treatment (FIT) in clinical practice has garnered much attention. This insightful review delves into the 2025 study by Drinane et al. "Attitudes among Therapists who Do (or Do Not) Implement Feedback-Informed Treatment," using the equity equation to revaluate its conclusions. By examining therapists' adoption of Feedback-Informed Treatment (FIT) through an equitable lens, we uncover the subtle ways feedback can enhance therapy outcomes and foster inclusivity. Grasping these dynamics is vital for advancing accessible and equitable mental health care.
Equity analysis in Feedback-Informed Treatment (FIT) implementation examines how therapist demographics affect FIT engagement and application. This examination uncovers biases in FIT's adoption and effectiveness, potentially due to systemic barriers. For example, therapists from marginalized groups might face limited access to FIT training, leading to lower implementation rates and perpetuating outcome disparities. Likewise, FIT may not resonate with therapists serving diverse communities if the Patent Reported Outcome Measures utilized lack cultural sensitivity.
Moreover, equity analysis highlights biases in interpreting FIT feedback. Therapists might prioritize feedback aligning with their cultural norms, risking inequitable outcomes and reduced cultural competence. By addressing these biases, stakeholders can enhance FIT implementation and promote equitable mental health care. Targeted training and culturally inclusive FIT adaptations are strategies to foster diversity and equity in therapeutic practices.
How does Feedback-Informed Treatment Impact Therapy Outcomes?
Feedback-informed treatment (FIT) has demonstrated a distinct capability to enhance therapy outcomes by actively involving both the therapist and the client in the treatment process. By systematically tracking progress through standardized measures, therapists gain valuable insights into the effectiveness of their interventions. This collaborative feedback loop ensures that therapy is tailored to meet the unique needs of each client, promoting personalized care and greater engagement.
Studies reveal that when therapists commit to incorporating regular feedback, they can better address potential barriers and adjust their strategies accordingly. This adaptability not only fosters improved outcomes but also minimizes disparities in effectiveness among therapists. By empowering therapists with data-driven insights, FIT becomes a pivotal tool for refining the therapeutic process, ultimately aiding in the delivery of more efficient and impactful care.
Furthermore, Feedback-Informed Treatment (FIT) plays a pivotal role in balancing the therapeutic field. By reducing the gap between more effective and less effective therapists, it ensures a consistent quality of care regardless of individual therapist characteristics. This approach benefits all clients by promoting a standardized and equitable form of therapy, thereby enhancing the overall efficacy of treatment across varied populations.
Feedback-Informed Treatment: Therapist Attitudes
The study doesn't concentrate on demographic or systemic equity elements but sheds light on significant attitudinal barriers that could impact equitable care. Therapists who deeply rely on their clinical intuition and remain skeptical about measurement-based practices may resist integrating FIT. Despite the method's aim to enhance patient outcomes through regular feedback, these attitudes can hinder its widespread adoption and the potential benefits it offers.
To further enhance equity, it’s essential to understand how therapist attitudes towards FIT can significantly influence its implementation and outcomes. Recognizing the importance of feedback not only promotes higher efficacy but also ensures a more equitable distribution of quality care across diverse patient groups. Here's a table illustrating ways to enhance equity through FIT by addressing various therapist attitudes:
Tailoring FIT Implementation to Therapist Attitudes for Equitable Outcomes
Therapist Attitude | Observed Behavior | Equity Risk | Policy Recommendation to Enhance Equity |
Embraces FIT | Uses client feedback consistently | High responsiveness to diverse needs | Sustain engagement through incentives, peer learning, and recognition of equity-focused outcomes |
Skeptical of Outcome Measurement | Avoids or inconsistently uses ORS/SRS | Missed opportunities to identify disparities | Provide training on predictive validity and cultural relevance of FIT tools; normalize feedback culture |
Prefers Clinical Intuition | Relies on personal judgment over data | Risk of bias and cultural mismatch | Promote supervision that balances intuition with data; use FIT to challenge assumptions and improve accuracy |
Overconfident in Predictive Ability | Rarely adjusts treatment based on feedback | Overlooks client distress or stagnation | Use FIT data to highlight discrepancies between perceived and actual progress; encourage reflective practice |
Avoids Feedback Tools | Views feedback as intrusive or invalid | Reduced client voice in care decisions | Make feedback tools culturally responsive and easy to use; offer consultation on introducing tools effectively |
Disengaged from FIT | Discontinues FIT use over time | Inconsistent equity monitoring | Provide infrastructure for sustained use (e.g., tech support, consultation access); monitor equity outcomes regularly |
Open but Untrained | Willing to use FIT but lacks skill | Inconsistent implementation | Offer hands-on training and mentorship; include equity-focused case examples in consultation |
Reluctant to Change Practice | Resistant to shifting from depth-oriented models | Misalignment with client goals | Use alliance scores to guide treatment focus; encourage alignment with client-stated reasons for seeking care |
The Role of Equity in Therapy Practices
Understanding equity in therapy extends beyond surface-level adjustments—it's about creating fair opportunities and tailored outcomes for every client. By weaving equity principles into practice, you're tackling disparities not as isolated issues, but as interconnected influences shaping therapeutic outcomes. Embracing diversity means recognizing the specific backgrounds of your clients and customizing interventions to meet their unique needs. This approach not only aligns with individualized care but also has the transformative power to enhance client success significantly.
Research demonstrates that incorporating feedback-informed treatment can significantly improve equity in therapeutic outcomes. By actively employing feedback, you help close the effectiveness gap between therapists, setting the stage for an equitable treatment landscape. This ensures that no matter which therapist a client consults, the chances for a successful treatment outcome are equally robust. When equity is embedded into practice, it empowers the use of feedback for ongoing development, creating benefits for both clients and therapists alike.
The equity equation offers a robust framework for assessing feedback-informed treatment tools with a focus on access, engagement, and effectiveness. Utilizing this framework allows you to pinpoint and address the barriers and biases present in treatments, forging a path towards making equitable healthcare a tangible reality. This ambition necessitates not only structural transformations in therapy practices but also an evolution in attitudes and policies that advocate for comprehensive and inclusive care.
Equity is encapsulated by a straightforward formula:
Equity = (Access × Engagement × Effectiveness) / (Barriers + Bias)
This framework provides valuable guidance for evaluating and enhancing the equity of digital tools in psychotherapy, focusing on ensuring fair access and engagement while minimizing biases and barriers. By applying these principles, you can adapt your practices to better cater to the diverse needs of client groups.
Breakdown Using the Equity Equation
The equity equation illuminates the differing approaches of therapists who utilize Feedback-Informed Treatment (FIT) in contrast to those who do not. By examining therapist attitudes towards feedback-informed treatment implementation, we can underscore the significance of adopting feedback to enrich therapy outcomes. Therapists who integrate FIT show a dedication to continual growth and responsiveness to client needs. On the other hand, those reluctant to implement FIT may harbor doubts about its efficacy or relevance. This divide highlights the critical need for tailored education and supportive networks to overcome these attitudinal barriers and cultivate an environment where all therapists are motivated to incorporate feedback into their practice.
Let's delve into how the equity equation can be applied practically, focusing on therapists' experiences, motivations, and barriers in implementing feedback-informed treatment. This categorization can provide valuable insights, guiding constructive shifts toward achieving a more equitable therapy landscape:
Access: FIT practitioners engage in continuous practices, using data to identify disparities and respond to diverse client needs, while non-FIT practitioners risk inconsistency and may miss disparities due to less structured oversight.
Engagement: With FIT, therapists actively use client feedback and relationship scores to shape personalized and client-focused care. In contrast, non-FIT therapists often rely on clinical impressions, potentially ignoring client input and leading to mismatched objectives.
Effectiveness: FIT users make data-informed treatment adjustments, effectively countering personal overconfidence. Therapists without FIT may rely heavily on intuition, potentially remaining unaware of stagnant treatment progress.
Barriers: FIT adoption tackles barriers through training and supervision, integrating FIT tools into regular practice, while non-FIT therapists might resist outcome measurement due to limited trust in data and insufficient support.
Bias: By utilizing detailed data, FIT practitioners can identify disparities and encourage reflective practices and openness to feedback. Non-FIT therapists might unknowingly maintain biases, missing out on key feedback opportunities needed for self-improvement.
Focusing on these critical areas, you, as a therapist or stakeholder, are instrumental in closing gaps, transforming Feedback-Informed Treatment into a path towards more equitable mental health services for everyone.
Therapists' Implementation Challenges and Considerations
When delving into the intricacies therapists face with Feedback-Informed Treatment, acknowledging the distinct qualities each practitioner brings is key. These personal variations can determine the success of feedback strategies, underlining the importance of tailored methods. FIT administrative guidance is vital in overcoming obstacles at both the individual clinician and organizational levels. By emphasizing the predictive validity of treatment responses and encouraging consistent collection of outcome data from the beginning, therapists can create interventions that better align with individual client needs.
Additionally, therapists' perspectives are pivotal. Their view of measurement tools significantly influences their readiness to integrate these methods into their treatment plans. Educating clinicians on the use of feedback tools and nurturing a feedback-centric culture can reduce resistance. Furthermore, suggesting the acquisition of collateral information (e.g., from family or other providers) deepens insight into treatment effects and underscores the value of these practices.
While considering therapist attitudes, focusing on client goals remains crucial. Urging therapists to prioritize the client's expressed reasons for seeking help ensures that everyone is on the same page. Implementing alliance scores (e.g., Session Rating Scale, or SRS) can highlight any discrepancies between what the therapist does and what the client wants, advising against treatments that do not align with client priorities.
Moreover, recognizing at-risk cases early is vital for effective therapy. By focusing on identifying cases that are not progressing or have relationship issues quickly—such as after just three visits using the Outcome Rating Scale (ORS) or six visits with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)—clinicians are encouraged to seek consultation sooner. This proactive approach boosts the potential for timely therapeutic adjustments.
Feedback-Informed Treatment: A Catalyst for Equitable Therapy?
This vision aligns with the fundamental principles of equity within healthcare, where equal access and fair treatment are prioritized. When therapists truly harness the potential of FIT, they can address individual client needs more accurately and responsively. By rooting therapy in consistent feedback loops, therapists are equipped to navigate and adapt to the unique dynamics of each therapeutic relationship.
Yet, the pathway to achieving this inclusive dream is not without its hurdles. It requires a conscientious effort from therapists to not only integrate feedback but to value it as a cornerstone of their practice. As therapists encounter diverse client experiences and expectations, FIT serves as a potent tool, breaking down pre-existing biases and promoting openness in clinical interactions.
Moreover, the regular collection of client data under FIT mirrors broader trends in evidence-based practices within healthcare. This data-driven approach further reinforces the credibility and accountability of therapeutic interventions, ensuring that clients receive the most effective care. The potential of FIT to serve as a catalyst for equitable therapy highlights its importance not just as a method, but as a movement towards comprehensive, fair, and empathetic mental health care for all.
🔍 Has This Study Ignited Your Interest in Equitable Therapy?
If so, you might want to delve deeper into the transformative intersection of mental health and technology. An excellent opportunity for further exploration is the upcoming event:
🧠 “Global Mental Health Equity: Tackling Biases in Digital Mental Health Assessment Tools”
📍 Featured at the 10th Digital Mental Health Global Congress, organized by the eMental Health International Collaborative (eMHIC). Join us at eMHIC25 as Cindy Hansen, Chief Science Officer at Holistic Research Canada, guides you through exploring how reimagining digital assessments can be a crucial step in breaking down biases that impede global mental health equity.
In this enlightening session, you'll gain insight into the transformative efforts to create assessment tools that are more inclusive and effective. Hansen will delve into cutting-edge research and innovative strategies that align with the World Health Organization’s Mental Health Equity Goals, especially focusing on reducing barriers and biases.
This event is an opportunity to engage in thought-provoking discussions and collaborative dialogues that can change the landscape of digital mental health care. It's about harnessing technology fairly and equitably to ensure mental health resources are accessible to all, regardless of geographical or socio-economic barriers.
🎟️ Special Discount Code for Holistic Research Canada Members: As a token of appreciation for your commitment to advancing outcome informed care, Holistic Research Canada members will receive an exclusive discount. Don't miss this chance to be part of shaping an equitable future in digital mental health.
Comments